Comparison Of Apollo From The Portonaccio Temple And Aule Metele :: essays research papers

Comparison of Apollo from the Portonaccio Temple and Aule Metele     Though the figures are not outlying(prenominal) from each other is height comparison, they seem to contain a transparent amount of difference in other aspects. First of all, they were made from divers(prenominal) materials. While the Apollo statue is terracotta, the Aule Metele is of bronze. Generally speaking, the Apollo statue appears in a very symbolical agency in that his features are not well defined in breaker point while the Aule Metele presentments a type of inspiring complexity with detail.      The Apollo statue consists of a outfit that is shown in a pattern like manner. The robe does not display realism but symbolism due to its lack of variation in the folds. The Aule Metele however, shows a striking deal of realism in the drooping folds and reprobate shoulder strap. It looks as though the material is in fact freely moving and could be manipulated. The mu scle structure of the Apollo statue also displays a great deal of generalization. The limbs are robust and irregularly plump in areas as can be seen in the calf area of the right leg. The Aule Metele displays a great deal of understanding of muscle as well as pearl structure in the limbs as can be seen in the edges created in the extended right arm of the figure.      In terms of aim and neck features, the figures seem to be most distant. While the Apollo statue has a large-scale smile on his face, the Metele has an expression of stern seriousness. The Apollo statue has no more facial nerve detail than cheekbones roughly instilled. The Metele shows complete understanding of the human muscle and bone structure in the face.