bingle was mavin of hu piece of musickind?s biggest enemies; the other was a capacious individual. These two men provide a croak pinch of Plato?s concept of concord and how it relates to the primal virtues. Plato viewed agreement as the salvation of the state and the individual, while division back up by the inconsistency of personal interests with those of the state is the devastation of the same(p) (Dunkle, 1986). He also believed that the way to make the most of ourselves as individuals is to relinquish ourselves of certain desires that atomic number 18 of the ?want? nature and that are antonym to the principles of courage, temperance, wisdom, and hardlyice: Plato?s cardinal virtues (Denise, White, and Peterfreund, 2008, p. 14). In this essay I will demonstrate that Plato?s theory send wadding ease be applied to modern society. The first gentleman is Adolph Hitler. Hitler g overn Germany from 1933, as appointed chancellor until he commit suicide in 1945. Hitle r?s beliefs guide to the cleanup slur of over 11 million Jews, homosexuals, Jehovah?s Witnesses, Afro-Europeans, smooth out citizens, Gypsies, and dis adequate to(p)d pot (Schwartz, 1997). According to Plato?s view, Hitler never achieved unison as an individual. He fai direct to ratio nicety, wisdom, temperance, and courage. He did a ill service to himself and to his country. He was ineffectual to control his desires and let justice fall its place. His idea of a pure race filled with blameless (genetically and physically) people led to one of the worst genocides in gentleman history: the holocaust. He proved to be unjust: justice never leads to the killing of innocent people. He proved to be a aircraft carrier of no knowledge of smashing or restraint: without justice, Good is incomplete. His last act of taking his life sentence proved him to be a coward. Hitler was unable to die for his beliefs. Rather, he died not to impertinence the consequences of his wrongdoing. The other man is Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi was ! an Indian ultranationalistic and spiritual drawing card who ultimately led India to freedom from English rule without a single act of fierceness on his part and his original followers. His emphasis was upon the force of law and non-violence in the struggle against evil. He started a movement of well-behaved disobedience rather than apply weapons in assemble to set about his message across: Indians would no longer allow England to steal, fleece, repress and impose authority over India. We can easyly see in Gandhi a man of strong beliefs and whose beliefs, originating from ?Good?, led to more ?Good?. Gandhi is an ideal of justice, wisdom, temperance, and courage and of what those virtues in balance can create. Justice is turn out by the choices he makes and the means in which he chooses to incline those choices; wisdom is shown by his very belief of Indian be to Indians; temperance is shown by his loyalty to his principles, never once tone ending for the tripping way of appealing to weapons; and courage is shown by his hardihood in standing up for the whole nation of India in get the face of the Indian Independence Movement. He is one of the superior contributors to modern India (state) in terms of freedom.
By run across all the cardinal virtues one can only copulate off to the logical conclusion that Mr. Gandhi reached harmony according to Plato?s view. nevertheless to his death he kept his integrity and morality. It is clear the fix of Plato?s idea in modern society. one(a) can plainly see Plato?s principle of harmony and how it relates to the cardinal virtues by the comparison of Hitler and Gandhi and the way they chos! e to live their lives. One is able to see the two extreme end results of having or not having harmony according to Plato. Justice and injustice are corresponding ?disease and health; being in the soul just what disease and health are in the tree trunk? That which is legal causes health, and that which is unhealthy causes disease?? (Denise, White, and Peterfreund, 2008, p. 15). Works CitedDatta, V. (2006, October 8). Spectrum. Retrieved September 7, 2008, from The Tribune revolve vane put: http://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20061008/spectrum/book1.htDenise, T., White, N., & Peterfreund, S. (2008). Great Traditions in Ethics. Thompsom Wadsworth. Dunkle, Roger (1986). Republic. Retrieved September 7, 2008, from AbleMedia electronic network office: http://ablemedia.com/ctcweb/netshots/republic.htmSchwartz, T. (1997). Holocaust Forgotten. Retrieved September 7, 2008, from Holocaust Forgotten tissue site: http://www.holocaustforgotten.com/non-jewishvictims.htm If you want to get a plentiful essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
