.

Monday, January 14, 2019

Are private beliefs the legitimate concern of employers? Essay

Employers should be concerned with some of what there employee believes in, however snobbish beliefs may be taking this too far. An employer should be watchful of their employees, to ingest sure that they dont get in to trouble, and are non suffering from stress. It is in the employers best interests that this is done so that the employee is the close productive that he or she can be. However in a world where peoples privacy is becoming less and less, is it right for an employer to be concerned with the private beliefs of their employee? I think that it is, because the welfare of the employer and all of the workers could in the most extreme case be in jeopardy.We have controversy concerning employee privacy. forthwith workers every keystroke leaves a trail of information that employers generally have the jural right to examine and use as the basis for disciplinary movement against employees. Employees have been fired because of the content of e-mails or for surfing to intern et sites deemed hostile by the employer. Employees have been forced to supply urine samples for drug testing, condition personality tests in prank interviews, and secretly videotapedeven in social club restrooms. Yet very few laws protect employee privacy the political exponent of business has been able to fend off most attempts to limit employer discretion. A few notable exceptions exist for example, federal law prohibits employers from administering lie-detector tests in job interviews.If an employer is trying to hire a fundamentalist, or a freedom champ for example, then I think that it is in the employers benefit that they know this information. It is in the interests of the companys security that this information should be known to them. The worlds growth diversity cultural, racial, ethnic and unearthly, poses significant challenges and opportunities for the corporate workplace. The transformation from a comparatively homogenous society to the present multicultural situa tion calls for special efforts to cling to a work environment free from intimidation, harassment and discrimination, and which promotes productivity and a strong bottomline.Unfortunately, the very programs designed to reduce problems are actually creating sassy ones. The issue of sexual orientation within diversity training courses is especially problematic, and the topic of heated discussions. While there is a genuine film to address the issues raised by employees who identify as gay or lesbian, some current attempts to do so end up discriminate against other employees. Given the strong feelings and sensitivities that surround the subject of private beliefs and feelings, poses a difficult challenge to employers.If business survival depends upon contented and loyal employees who sentience that their beliefs and values are respected, then focus upon sexual orientation as a diversity category is clearly counter-productive. For a great many Americans, the celebration of diversity is a thinly disguised attempt to decriminalize a behavior that they believe to be immoral and, what is more, to persuade them to form their beliefs.Prudence in the workplace can resolve potential unearthly discrimination problems before they become legal suits. If an employer is truly seeking to rove the diversity of the workforce, for both moral and practical reasons, avoidance of all forms of exacting sensitivity training, of whatever kind, should be the norm. Apart from the promotion of ad hoc social agendas, there is no need to require employees to endure lectures, presentations, fibre playing or simulations that are an affront to deeply held moral and religious beliefs.Civility programs recognize and acknowledge the real differences that exist between people, differences of birth and belief. Yet, in spite of these differences, it is possible to work with others different from oneself in incontrovertible and productive ways, even when strongly held beliefs differ and c lash. It is possible to be cultured toward those with whom we disagree, and to build a significant degree of unity and community in the workplace. For companies who seek to be globally competitive, this is a necessity.

No comments:

Post a Comment