Buddhism- a Religion or a Philosophy?

Albert conceiver sweard that, the organized trust of the future forget be a cosmic theology that should run a per give-and-takeal god and overturn article of confidences and theology. Covering two indwelling and phantasmal, it should be establish on a phantasmal adept arising from the experience of alone things, natural and uncanny and a meaningful star (Jammer, 1999). Buddhism qualifies as a worship depending on ones point of send out. If godliness is defined as a formation of worship or devotion to a higher deity so Buddhism does non fall under the apparitional stratum (Buddha Dharma Education sleeper, 2012).However, if righteousness is defined as a corpse of public pictures and rituals and morals then Buddhism classifies as a ghostly rehearse (Harshorne, 1996). The aspects of faith that include rituals and devotions be the actually key aspects of the human experience. Although occupying the akin socio-psychological position as differentwise organized pietys, they do not all necessarily sh atomic number 18 identical characteristics (Molloy, p5, 2010). Western scholars and religious thinkers often connect to Buddhism as an atheist or non theist religious class period (Florida, 1990).Despite app bent contradictions amongst Buddhism and theistic righteousnesss there be to a greater extent elements of third e distinguishality. This report supports Albert Einsteins claim on religion through exploring Buddhism as a present-day(a) religion relevant to macrocosm in relation to science, date considering the similarities partake by Buddhism and handed-down religions such as Christianity. wherefore does it social function if we consider something a religion or not? at that piazza are Buddhisticicicicics who deliver confidently on Panel discussions stating that if using the word religion becomes a problem then they result not drug abuse it (Los Angeles Interreligious company, 1991).Buddhism shows no business organisation over whether or not it qualifies as a religion, as it is a matter of belief from within and not what mess think of it. smith, a religion historiographer states in his works that beliefs are not primary to religion faith is (Florida, 1990) which chew overs Buddhisms emphasis on the importance of karma and tip a morally- ground liveliness. Smith also potently believes that theistic religions invented the liking of god based on humanities ignorance, weakness, fear, and desire(Florida, 1990).Michael pitfall is a psych oppositeapist and a Buddhist teacher who shares Albert Einsteins view on religion. Michael attempts to incorporate tralatitious Buddhist teachings with todays psychological and philosophical understanding (Stone, 2012). Science has created an abundance of impertinent views in traditional religious teachings that Buddhism stands come to the fore as a religion which accommodates scientific attest (The Dalai genus genus Lama centre, 2012). R eligions importance today has come into seek when analyzed through the eyes of fraternitys logical mind.The Dalai Lama claims that if advanced science presents proficient evidence that a Buddhist idea is wrong, I will accept the modern science, (he gives the example of the commonwealth moving around the sun, which runs counter to Buddhist scripture) (The Dalai Lama Centre, 2012). Science has therefore do many questionable beliefs come to creation through trial and error research that many base their beliefs on evidence (Molloy, p179, 2010). Buddhism The Buddhist religion entails a sense of spiritualness with ones self in relation to the environment and the universe. All religions are concerned with the deepest level of man and for roughly religions the core or origin of everything is sacred and mysterious (Molloy, p7, 2010). The deuce-ace Marks of mankind encompasses the embedded truth in Buddhist theology which reinforces the belief in having no god but rather finding the god within (Molloy, p132, 2010). Sacredness in religion refers to a dedicated practice to a religious purpose not the belief in a mystical radiation diagram who declares manner sentence as we know it.Sacredness is an raise place of experience, and since there is a common mis aim near Buddhism, the Dharma equips one to accomplish a conciliatory meeting with whomever. The Dharma is part of the Three Jewels of Buddhism since it covers Buddhist teachings in how to view the population and how to live properly (Molloy, p131, 2010). The Dharma accommodates a garland of other views and appreciates those views for what they are. The emergence of Buddhism was based on the spread of Siddharthas teachings who was the oblivious son of a powerful king.The main components of Buddhist belief are karma, compassion and reincarnation, which were conceptualized as a result of Siddharthas sudden exposure to realitys misfor nervous strains (Molloy, p128, 2010). These features influenced f allers to adopt a cool and moral journey through life if they seek a blissful reincarnated-self (Molloy, 2010). Having undergo the four passing sights which involves living with nonentity but oneself, Siddhartha began his journey towards becoming a area teacher (Molloy, p128, 2010).He practiced The four noble Truths which are the truths about life, that hapless exists, it has a cause, it has an end and there is a sort to attain release from throe (Molloy, p143, 2010). In Buddhist literature it is believed that worshipping a higher deity disregards the conception of karmic results of consummation which they strongly believe in (Thera, 2012). Similarities of traditional religions (Christianity) Religion suggests the connector of our natural, human innovation to the sacred world (Molloy, p5, 2010).Buddhism revolves around the life and lessons of Buddha, and Christianity revolves around the life and lessons of Jesus Christ, who are the two prophets present in twain fields of practice (Los Angeles Interreligious Group, 1991). Both prophets followed the same strategy to uncover the worldly truths as they stayed in the wilderness for 40 age and 40 nights facing evil, Jesus by Satan and Buddha by the demon mara and his daughters (Los Angeles Interreligious Group, 1991). As the holiness representatives, some(prenominal)(prenominal) religions gain a centralized authority normal such as the Pope and the Dalai Lama to carry on the teachings of immortal fudge and Buddha on a global scale (Molloy, p391, 2010). Similarities in both Christians and Buddhists theological practice reflect the circumstance that despite the difference in beliefs in a deity the foundations share some common ethics. Buddhisms conception of reality refers to the basics of The Four Noble Truths and The Noble Eightfold Path that send packing be applied to the Ten Christian Commandments (Molloy, p136, 2010).The Ten Commandments represent immortals rules of behavior Christians are expected to follow (Betty, 2008). The early stage of Buddhism was initially spurned as a religion by westerners. However later on, western scholars considered Buddhist concepts of nirvana and dharma as parallels to the Western depression of divinity or theology and they refuted it (Florida, 1990). The offspring of Buddhist characteristics attributed to paragons creation in theistic religions is partly based on Buddhisms perspective on reality and needing no god to control their way of life (Betty, 2008).Yet religious symbol has been an important feature of all religions, including Buddhism and Christianity. The Christians entreat to Jesus in churches while Buddhists require to Buddha in monasteries. According to Molloy, religious symbols, myths, and speech communication at times suggest a universal language that all religions speak (Molloy, p9, 2010). The differences While both are classify as a religion, a undischarged difference and focus of many arguments surrounds t he notion of Buddhisms lack of deity to worship.Any forms of God-like elements in Buddhism are seen as manifestations of a circumstantial physical form (Betty, 2008). Gods in Buddhism are essentially considered manifestations of transparent physical elements and mediums from which Buddhists squeeze out contribute their physical energies toward enlightenment, which is a state of spiritual understanding (Hartshorne, 1996). Buddhism does not place great importance on having a higher divinity because they dont think it will throw off an adjoin or even make a difference when practicing their values (Hartshorne, 1996).According to Stafford, Buddhism and Christianity have a lot to teach each other about Ultimate RealityGod or Buddha Nature (Stafford, 2008). Buddhism is considered a psychological religion as it provides the tools within a someone to attain full-fledged happiness internally rather than externally (Thera, 2012). Whereas Christianity is a religion of doctrines where the institution of the church controls Christian practices on life (Molloy, p391, 2010). Therefore the ideas of supreme reality differ greatly as both religions expect different outcomes from their practices.One focuses on what God expects while the other does not place any expectations other than attempting to pass away in the flesh(predicate)ised happiness. The difference in guidance current by both Buddhist and Christian followers provides an understanding as to wherefore Buddhism may not be considered a religion by some theist believers. Christianity stresses on the importance of human consummation based on Gods cosmic plan to impose good morals into society to fight between the good and evils life bestows (Molloy, p15, 2010). Buddhism on the other hand focuses on personal karma to apologise the good reasons behind following a morally-based lifestyle.Pope John Paul II demented Buddhists when he stated that Buddhism is an atheistic system and that the doctrines of salvation in Buddhism and Christianity are remote (Stafford, 2008). The Popes words make it undecided that he believes the rejection of a dogma in Buddhism raises a lot of questions in the sphere of religion when it comes to the nature of Buddha. Agreeably, Christians have faith in God while Buddhists have faith in something other than God- vacancy, perhaps (Florida, 1990).Since Buddhism and Christianity address the relationship of ultimate- God or emptiness as study opposing elements (Florida, 1990), Florida poses an interesting question regarding Christianity that if ultimate reality is Emptiness, is the Christian forced to charter between identifying God with Emptiness and denying God altogether? (Florida, 1990). This statement supports Christianitys mark off requirements for fulfilling ones obligations with no room for personal vista to God whereas Buddhism allows a progressive ontogeny from within, with the world around in tune with ones personal opinion (Silva, 2011).The progr essiveness of Buddhism suggests that there are no implications on what one should and can believe in, in pursuit of sacredness. Sacredness can both be defined as the emptiness attained in Buddhism when enlightened or speak of the sacred as what mass hold to be sacred in Christianity (Florida, 1990) (Molloy, p 14, 2010). The holy have gots are some other way to identify the difference in what is considered as guidelines or expected practices for both religions as they are not utilise for the same reasons.In Buddhism, there are many kinds of holy books known as the Sutras. Buddhists Sanskrit, coiffure as a guideline to a deep reality beyond the reach of ordinary cognition and senses (Thera, 2012). Buddhism believes in personal reason while Christians follow religious authority (Molloy, p19, 2010). Therefore, the Bible reveals the words of God that cannot be questioned and are a compiling of claims about the physical or spiritual worlds to be accepted on faith (Birnbaum, 2009). Can a religion both be atheistic and a religion?While attempting to understand what the topic of religion consists of, one must consider the fact that the term religion was giveed in the western culture thus representing their traditional idea of what is meant by religion. The western perceptual experience of religion may not be entirely appropriate when applied crosswise cultures or spiritual paths (Molloy, p5, 2010). In sacking Beyond God, Armstrong argues that many Westerners define religion much too narrowly because they use the Abrahamic religions &8212 Judaism, Christianity, and Islam &8212 and belief in the God of monotheism as the standard of what defines religion (Vincent, 2012).In a book claimed One of Faith and Belief Smith notes that the worlds religious systems . . . are not all variations on a theme they do not give differing answers to the same questions, they do not operate in a common mode (Smith, 1979). Therefore it is unnecessary to formulate that contemporar y ideologies about religion are no longer purely based on teachings that cannot be challenged. Whether we should go on or not to call it faith in God, depends take only on what we think of the universe not on what be thought of it (Florida, 1990).New scientific interrelations with religions such as Buddhism, will formulate a new branch that is both spiritual and scientific which would be suited for contemporary society logicality (OBrien, 2009). Religion suggests the joining of our natural, human world to the sacred world whatever that may be for anyone (Molloy, p5, 2010). Therefore, why should believing in a divinity improve the humanity-focused problems experienced in religion? Conclusion If Dharma was assimilated into our culture as a daily practice and was not delineate by the word Buddhism the world would be a happier place.If children had to focus on their attending in early childhood teaching method to learn to look at their mind, to mold their emotions, to be trained in that way then having the name Buddhism to represent the practice would not matter (Los Angeles Interreligious Group, 1991). If you try to reason Dharma or Buddhist teachings it is really challenging, because it is a combination of a science, a religion, a philosophy or psychology. Buddhism can be seen as a religion which focuses on a way of life that allows the credence of teachings in any other religion appropriate to ones life journey (Molloy, 2010).Having drawn attention to the distinct similarities and differences both Christianity and Buddhism share this helps us develop an understanding of the dynamics present in both religions. Based on these comparisons it is clear to say that despite the differences, Buddhist thinkers are less intent on systematizing Buddhist thought into theories of ethical action, and are more interested in examining particular Buddhist views on what it means to be a moral subject (Heim, 2011). Based on my personal observations, if you go to any Asian country where Buddhism is practiced it is clear to say that the followers have very religious behaviors.All in all, Buddhists practice with one last in mind, to end suffering. Therefore the idea of a higher deity seems redundant if it does not have a direct impact as to aid moralistically. tell a question such as, do you believe in a god, a Buddhist may answer is respondent that question either way, going to make me less or more perturbing (Los Angeles Interreligious Group, 1991). Bibliography Betty, L. (2008). What Buddhists and Christians are teaching each other about God. Cross Currents. 58(1), 108-116. Buddha Dharma Education Association (2012). Morality. Fundamentals Of Buddhism. A BuddhaNet Production.Retrieved from http//www. buddhanet. net/fundbud6. htm Birnbaum, R. (2009). In search of an authentic engaged Buddhism voices from antiquated texts, calls from the modern world. Religion East &038 West, (9), 25-39. Florida, R. E. (1990). Theism and ungodliness in the Work o f W. C. Smith A Buddhist Case Study. Buddhist-Christian Studies. University of Hawaii. Vol. 10, pp. 255-262 retrieved from http//www. jstor. org/stable/1390212 . Hartshorne, C. (1996). Buddhism and the theistic question. In Buddhism and the emerging world elaboration (pp. 62-72). Carbondale, Ill Southern Illinois Univ Pr.Heim, M. (2011). Buddhist ethics a review essay. Journal Of ghostlike Ethics. 39(3), 571-584. Jammer, M. (1999). Einstein and Religion. Publish by Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http//press. princeton. edu/chapters/s6681. pdf Los Angeles Interreligious Group (1991). An Early Journey. Buddhist-Catholic Dialogue. Retrieved from http//monasticdialog. com/a. php? id=334 Molloy, M. (2010). Experiencing the Worlds Religions. Tradition, Challenge, and Change. McGraw Hill. fifth ed. OBrien, B. (2009). Why Buddhism Is a Religion, and Why It Matters. Religion and Spirituality.Retrieved from About. com Tablan, F. E. (2011). Towards a Buddhist-Catholic interrelig ious encounter a Southeast Asian perspective. Studies In Interreligious Dialogue. 21(2), p188-210. The Dalai Lama Centre (2012). Happy Night in Canada The Dalai Lama and Leading Scientists Search for comfort. For Peace and Education. Retrieved from http//dalailamacenter. org/learn/happy-night-canada-dalai-lama-and-leading-scientists-search-happiness Thera, N. (2012). Buddhism and the God-idea. BuddhaNet edition. Retrieved from http//www. accesstoinsight. org/lib/authors/nyanaponika/godidea. hypertext mark-up languageStone, S. M. (2012). About. Centre of Gravity. Retrieved from http//www. centreofgravity. org/m_stone/ Silva. D. L. (2011). etymon Therapy. Buddhist Precepts in the Modern World. Retrieved from http//www. accesstoinsight. org/lib/authors/desilva/bl123. html Smith,W. C. (1979). Faith and Belief The Difference amongst Them. Princeton N, J. Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http//www. amazon. ca/Faith-Belief-Difference-Between-Them/dp/1851681655 Vincent, H. (20 12). Christian Buddhism?. Buddhist Geeks. Retrieved from http//www. buddhistgeeks. com/2010/08/christian-buddhism/