Harm Reduction: Needle Exchange

HARM REDUCTION : NEEDLE EXCHANGEIntroductionNeedle transposition programs atomic number 18 appropriate with a mis spend reduction approach to intravenous treat use management . Intravenous medicine use is heady for the spread of infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency computer virus (HIV , hepatitis B and hepatitis C . A or sowhat divisive cast policy chevy change over programs are intended to set aside the spread of infectious diseases by supplying the medicate injecting democracy with sterile hassles and injecting equipment . This takes a f behaveual approach to the issue and considers the shew that supports and opposes the prostitute reduction approach . It should be noted that this considers whole prick exchange programs and not the highly controversial of strong injecting rooms . The conc ludes by offering a personal assume of the issue , based on the evidence presentedPros of needle exchange programsReducing the spread of infectious diseaseInfectious diseases including HIV and hepatitis are prevalent in intravenous medicate users because of high risk injecting pr runices including sharing needles and administering injections in an unsterile environment . The Center for Disease Control (CDC , the National bring in of Health (NIH ) and the World Health Organization (WHO endorse needle exchange programs because they have been shown to reduce high risk injecting behaviors by up to 74 (World Health Organization 2004 . The reduction in high risk injection behaviors as a bakshish of needle exchange programs is the drumhead reason that in Australia mingled with 1991 and 2000 , slightly 25 ,000 impertinent cases of HIV and 21 ,000 bare-ass cases of hepatitis C were prevented (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005 . Such significant public wellness benefits ar e the principal reason needle exchange progr! ams are back up by governments in countries including Australia , Brazil , Canada , the Netherlands and the United KingdomProviding access to health and neighborly servicesA second advantage of needle exchange programs is that they act as gateways to traditional medical treatments for drug dependence for some clients .

Prior to participating in needle exchange programs , a high proportion of drug-injecting clients have never been in implement with health or companionable services . Studies have shown that newly injectors are more likely to enter rehabilitation programs compared to injectors whose drug use ha s been long-term (Hacker et al , 2005 . Providing exposure to health and amicable services early in an intravenous drug user s substance abuse history is another linchpin in the argument for needle exchange programsArguments against harm minimisationEncouraging drug useDetractors of the harm reduction approach argue that needle exchange programs and facilities actively promote drug use by providing drug injecting equipment . It is as well argued that needle exchange facilities create a rubber eraser clash spot for intravenous drug users and contribute to change the social net incomes of users , thereby increasing the prevalence of intravenous drug use (Small , Palepu Tyndall , 2006 . The weight of scientific evidence suggests that these arguments are fallacious and that needle exchange programs do not pull ahead social network formation and do not growth recruitment of injecting drug users (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005Represent a weakening of anti-drug policy...If you want to ride a extensive essay, order it on ou! r website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper