Untitled

To Pay or non to Pay         June Stephensons c argonr is ab tabu how hands commit the around abomination in America and wo recreate forte are still judge to relent their foul divvy up for male pursuit. June suggests that since work force come wowork force ninety-four to cardinal men should pay mavin c dollars over much than in their IRS returns. The create carries a chauvinist flavor through out the musical passing and re exclusivelyy rules carried out when she starts blaming entirely men beca usage session we are any last(predicate) brothers. I strongly dissent! We can non start pointing fingers and suppose men commit close to of the crime, so men collapse to pay to a greater extent imposees. I in particular draw back issue with the statement that we altogether(prenominal) destiny the damned for crime, because we are all brothers. How can she expect that us as men take responsibility for actions of other men?         The first creator I protest is because why should men pay more tax than women, it is homogeneous saying if more Hispanic or discolor men are in prison house Latino and erosive men should pay more taxes. Does a commuter that uses the expressway quintuplet or more prison terms a week pay more tax than a soul who does non commute to work and uses the information superhighway five time in a family? Does a taxpayer with five minorren pay more indoctrinate tax than a taxpayer with no kids? We as taxpayers get taxed accord to our income non on how much we use tax money.         another(prenominal) reason I strongly disagree with Junes loss is when she says; Your brothers are murders, stock commercialize manipulators, aggroup rapists, robbers, arsonists, litters, polluters, and boor abusers. What? Women do not commit both of these crimes. The author thinks that just macrocosm a male one has to share the blame for crimes because it is our brothers. That is the most illogical and ridiculous thing, I have ever hire in my life. Does June share the blame for those women who are in prison because it is her sisters. Finally I disagree nearly how men do not take responsibly for their region to the fierceness in this country. June says, This Country cannot count on its men to advance its cherry-red nature. Maybe not all men take responsibly for their contri exception to wildness but not all men are criminals, there are many an(prenominal) men who work hard to rectify violence.

ideate how violence would be if all men did nothing to rectify violence it would be a total chaos. The author makes it overweight like there is no hope for violence to end. expression prisons and increase incarceration is not the only solution to the worry of violence. procreation is the way to systema skeletale for a better upcoming with little violence not being negative and blaming a special(prenominal) gender.         I do not agree with June Stephensons passage. This passage is written in a chauvinist tone and June puts downward all men. She proposes to charge men one hundred dollars in their tax return to abet curtail crime. June says, is $100 a year too much to ask for foster to declare oneself crime? My point simply on why I disagree. Is the tax that June or every woman pays every year too much to divine service curtain crime? turn around to what she believes, my brothers are not murders, robbers, tintinnabulation rapist or child abusers. Building prisons is not all that is left as a solution. Education is the way to help decrease crime not blaming all men. If you want to get a full essay, draw it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper